About this Research Project
Newly Added Extra Web Page Menus
The Chinese Ch'an Monk P'u-k'o, the Komosō Beggars
& the Imperialistic Catholic Christian Intruders
- the Rōnin Samurai, the Fuke-Komosō, the Komusō
& the Kyōto Myōan Temple - an Unbiased Narrative
The Amazing Fuke Zenji / Fuke Shakuhachi /
Fuke-shū Legend Fabrication Hoax
To be - or not to be: a "Zen Buddhist Priest"?
Preliminary Realizations & Conclusions
1549 ... The Catholic Christian Century in Japan
& the Temple Patron Household System
Ascetic Shakuhachi Ideology
and the Realization of The Non-Dual
- Highlighted Quotations
Chronology of Ascetic Shakuhachi
Ideology-related Terms, Concepts & Names
Various Errors, Misconceptions & Loose Ends
Wikipedia: Inaccuracies & Misunderstandings
regarding Komusō, Fuke-shū, Suizen etc.
The Source Collections
The Japanese Written Sources - An Overview
Texts, Quotations & Illustrations
A Chronological Panorama
• INDIA - 1 webpage
• CHINA - 2 webpages
• JAPAN - 8 webpages
• The WEST - 1 webpage
Research Cases of Particular Significance,
Real Importance & Special Concern
ERA of the KOMOSŌ - The "Mat Monks"
c. 1450 to c. 1550
1470s?: The Dance-kyōgen Play Rakuami
1474: Tōyō Eichō and Ikkyū Sōjun at the
Inauguration of the Rebuilt Daitoku Temple
1494 & 1501: Two Enchanting Muromachi Period
Poetry Contest Picture Scrolls
1512: The Taigenshō Court Music Treatise
ERA of the FUKE-SŌ / FUKE-KOMOSŌ
c. 1550 to c. 1640
The Komosō & Fuke-sō / Fuke-komosō Sources
1550-1560: The Setsuyō-shū Dictionaries
1614: The Keichō kenmon-shū Short Story Book:
The Fuke-komosō in Hachiō-ji, West of Edo City
1621-1625: The Neo-Confucian Scholar Hayashi Razan
on the Shakuhachi, Komosō and Related Matters
1623: Anrakuan Sakuden's Encounter
with a Wandering Fuke-sō
1628: The Kaidō honsoku Fuke-komosō Credo
1637-1640: The Shimabara Uprising on Kyūshū,
the National "Sects Inspection Bureau"
and the Final Extinction of All Catholic Believers
c. 1640?: The Kaidō honsoku "Version 2"
ERA of the KOMUSŌ
"Monks of the Non-Dual & None-ness"
c. 1640 to 1871
The Early Komusō-related Texts
- from c. 1640 to c. 1752
c. 1640?: The Strange Butsu-gen Komusō Document
1646: Abbot Isshi Bunshu's Letter to the
"Proto-Komusō" Sandō Mugetsu
1646 ... The Hottō Kokushi / Kakushin Legend:
"The Four Buddhist Laymen" & the "Disciple" Kichiku
1650s?: The Kaidō honsoku "Version 3" Copy
The Kyōto/Kansai Sources
1664: The Shichiku shoshinshū Music Treatise
c, 1665-1675?: The Kyotaku denki Fairy Tale:
Shinchi Kakushin, Kichiku & Kyōto Myōan-ji
The Edo/Kantō/Tōkyō Sources
1677: The Enpō 5, 6th Month
Reihō-ji Komusō Set of Rules
1678: The Enpō 5, 12th Month Komusō-ha Oboe
Bakufu Memorandum of January 11th, 1678
1687: The Jōkyō 4, 6th Month
Reihō-ji Komusō Set of Rules
c. 1685-1690: The Yōshū fu-shi
& Jinrin kinmō zu-i - Evidence of Myōan-ji
1694: Myōan-ji Founder Engetsu Ryōgen's
23 Rules for his Komusō Disciples
1703 & 1705: The Kyōto Myōan-ji
c/o Kōkoku-ji & Myōshin-ji Interrelationship
1722: The Kyōhō 7, 6th Month,
Reihō-ji Komusō Memorandum
1730: The Kyōhō 15, 7th Month, Ichigetsu-ji
& Reihō-ji Komusō Memorandum
1732: The Shakuhachi denrai-ki
and Early Honkyoku History
1735: Kyōto Myōan-ji Temple Chief Admin
Kandō Ichiyū's Letter about Sankyorei-fu,
the "Three Non-Dual Spirit Music Pieces"
1751: The Keichō 19/1614 Komusō Certificate
The Many Different All Fabricated Versions
1752: Kyōto Myōan-ji Founder Engetsu
Ryōgen's 23 Fixed Rules for the Komusō
1795: The Kyotaku denki kokujikai Source Book
1816: Miyaji Ikkan's Shakuhachi hikki Book
1823: Hisamatsu Fūyō's Hitori mondō a.o.
Post-Edo & Post-WW2 Period History Sources & Matters
The Re-Writing & Re-Falsification
of Shakuhachi Narratives
1 - MEIJI PERIOD till the mid-19th CENTURY
1871? (1843-44): The Komusō zakki
From 1879 ... 1896-1914 & 1967-1971:
The Koji ruien Source Collection
2 - POST-WW2 till TODAY: JAPAN
1950: "The Myōan Temple of the True Fuke Sect"
Inauguration at Tōfuku Temple in SE Kyōto
1960: Uramoto Setchō's Essay about
Gyō no ongaku: "Music of Asceticism"
3 - POST-WW2 till TODAY: The WEST
1945 ... : Some Early Post-WW2 Shakuhachi Narratives
Written and Published in Western Languages
Translations of Shakuhachi Source Texts
published in the West / Outside of Japan
including the Internet / WWW
- The Translators
Literature / References
Profile / Bio / CV
1945 ... : Some Early Shakuhachi Narratives
Written and Published in Western Languages
Well, to be completely truthful and factual, Post-WW2 historians and japanologists publishing in Western languages about the shakuhachi, its history and music, did indeed base themselves quite substantially on these three initially mentioned texts that first appeared in print in English in London as early as in 1861, in French in Hongkong in 1899, and in English in 1935, respectively - for both good and also bad, that is ... :
GEORGE SMITH – 1861
Quotation from George Smith: "Ten Weeks in Japan."
Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, London, 1861.
"To another class of beggars whom I frequently observed in the streets it is more difficult to assign their real position and character. A solitary musician might sometimes be seen clad in the humblest garb and wearing a straw-plaited hat, which in the form of a bee-hive reached down to his neck and concealed his features. Only a small slender openings in the pattern of the plait enabled the wearer to view the eternal world through his visor and to thread his way from house to house. Playing a slow mournful tune on a flute, he passed tardily and wearisomely along his route, abstaining from all importunate demands and contendedly receiving only such alms as spontaneously were dropped into his suspended bag in front.
An obscure mystery hangs over the real character of these men. Common rumour assigns them as belonging to the class of disgraced officers who having incurred degradation and punishment by the ruling powers are condemned to live upon the alms of the charitable, with the permission or prescriptive custom of veiling their face and concealing their countenance from the rude gaze of their possible acquaintances in the passing throng."
Quoted from pages 59-60.
EDMOND PAPINOT - 1899
Edmond Papinot: Dictionnaire japonais-francais des noms principaux de
l'histoire et de la géographie du Japon suivi de
17 appendices sur les empereurs, shōgun, nengō,
sectes bouddhistes, provinces, départements, mesures, etc.
Edmond Papinot & Terence Barrow: Historical and geographical dictionary of Japan,
with an introduction to the new edition by Terence Barrow.
Tuttle Publishing, Rutland, Vermont, 1989.
First edition in English translation by Terence Barrow publ. in 1910.
According to Edmond Papinot, writing in 1899 in French, here translated to English:
A branch of the Zen sect, founded by the Chinese bonze Fuke-Zenji.
In 1248, the bonze Kakushin went to China, where the famous Busshō-Zenji of the Gokoku-ji temple taught him the doctrines of the sect.
There was a certain Chōyū in the temple who was very skilful in playing the flute (shakuhachi) and from him Kakushin received lessons.
After his return to Japan (1254), he went through the country preaching and playing the flute.
His successors Kichiku and Komu did likewise, and the name of the latter, Komu-sō has become the generic name by which
travelling bonzes of the sect were designated.
Under the Tokugawa, many samurai without masters enrolled in the Fuke-shū sect, dressed in the traditional costume and wore large hats
so as to hide their faces.
They went through the country begging and playing the flute.
To avoid justice or the supervision of the shogunate, it became customary to become a Komusō;
but disorders having ensued, Ieyasu published a regulation to fix their privileges and their obligations.
The sect has seventy-three temples, all depending on Ichigetsu-ji at Koganei (Shimōsa).
It was interdicted at the Restoration."
SIR CHARLES ELIOT - 1935 / 1964
Quotation from Sir Charles Eliot's book titled "Japanese Buddhism."
Edward Arnold & Co., London, 1935.
3rd impression, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964.
"In many Japanese sects there is a small but extravagent sub-section. In Zen this is the Fukeshū, started as early as 1254 by the priest Kakushin. He visited China and learnt there not only theology but music. On his return he wandered about Japan preaching and playing the flute. The sect thus formed is often called Komusō, from the name of one of his successors, and the custom grew up for wandering Samurai and outlaws to join it. It became so much a method of evading justice that Ieyasu subjected it to strict regulations and it was entirely suppressed in 1871. But in springtime strolling flute-players may still be seen in various country districts (for instance, at Nara) wearing large hats shaped like beehives which entirely cover the upper part of the face and are part of the traditional costume of the Fukeshū. But I believe that these modern minstrels claim no connection with Buddhism."
Quoted from page 285.
WILLIAM P. MALM - 1959
William P. Malm: Japanese Music and Musical Instruments.
1st edition. Charles E. Tuttle. Tokyo, New York & London, 1959.
William P. Malm: Traditional Japanese Music and Musical Instruments.
New edition. Tokyo, New York & London, 2000.
Researching and writing during the mid-1950s, musicologist prof. William P. Malm - following his discussion of the gagaku shakuhachi, the hitoyogiri and the
komosō - continues this narrative of his that remained the only widely "accepted" characterization of the komusō phenomenon for many many years like this:
"The modern shakuhachi is the product of a very different age. There are legends that speak of a Heian origin or the importation of modern shakuhachi music from China via the Zen Priest Chosan. However, significant shakuhachi music is a product of the Edo period. It is difficult to form an accurate picture of of how this music evolved, as faking historical documents was a favorite pastime of Edo writers.
One thing is certain: the main figure in the growth of this music was the komusō, a new kind of wandering priest. These basket-hatted men can still be seen on the streets of modern Japan.. From behind their wicker visors, they have viewed the flow of Japanese life from the seventeenth century to the present. However, theirs was not always a passive interest in the daily affairs of the townspeople. It is believed that their name is a corruption of the word komosō, but their function in society was far different.
The ranks of the komusō were not drawn primarily from the seekers of Buddha's paradise. Rather, they were filled with ronin, masterless samurai who had lost their original rank and privileges during the violent clan struggles that marked the late sixteenth century. These men sought satisfaction more in earthly revenge than in heavenly rewards. It was from such ranks that many of the early Christians were drawn. When the Christian movement was halted by the slaughter of Shimabara (1638), many of these ronin felt their entire class would fall victim to the paranoid vengeance of the shogun government.
It is believed that one group of these desperate men formed a komuso group in Kyoto called the Fukeshu. (Note 3). They secretly purchased a building which was associated with one of the larger Buddhist temples, in hopes that the shogun would not view their group as a Christian revival. This headquarters they named the Meian Temple. However, they were subjected to suspicion from other ancillary temples. In addition to their dislike of the ronin's unsavory background, these other temples probably felt an Edo-style fear of guilt by association.
In order to secure their position, the Fukeshu faked a number of papers claiming their historical origins as coming from China via the abovementioned priest Chosan. They also produced a copy of a license from the first shogun, Ieyasu, giving them the exclusive right to solicit alms by means of shakuhachi playing. Armed with these documents, they finally notified the authorities of their existence and asked for official recognition of their temple and their rights. When the government received this request, they immediately demanded the original Ieyasu document. The Fukeshu claimed that it had been burned years earlier. It seemed certain that this group was destined to be short lived when one of the shogun's wiser advisers suggested that they be granted their request. His reasoning was that to destroy the group would be to scatter and further embitter already vengeful men. It would be wiser to grant them their much coveted security and preferment on condition that they act as spies for the government and keep track of the goings-on of all the other ronin. Such a preposition was made and accepted.
To facilitate the exchange of information as well as control of the organization, the komuso headquarters was moved to Tokyo, the seat of the shogun's government. Their "religious" headquarters was established in the Ichigatsu and Heiho temples outside Tokyo, while their "business" center was located in Asakusa, in the heart of the entertainment district. From there, they could fan out along the avenues and back alleys of this famous pleasure district, playing a few soft melodies and overhearing equally intimite conversations. Though the Meiji Restoration abolished this organization, one finds today that the wandering komuso of Tokyo still have many acquaintances on the police force. Whether one is dealing with the vendettas that fermented in the back streets of old Edo or the machinations that whirl through the modern Tokyo underworld, there is great need for "stool pigeons". - - - "
Quoted from pages 153-154 in the 1959 edition.
Note 3: "The following account is based on the incomplete research of the late Chikuzen Nakatsuka. A resumé of his work can be found in ref. 16, 224-228."
T.O. comment: Nakatsuka Chikuzen, 1887-1944, was a Kinko-ry&%0363; shakuhachi player and historian whose impressive research in surviving historical shakuhachi sources was published
in the music magazine Sankyoku during the period July 1936 through July 1939. When in 1979 the publishing company Nihon Ongaku-sha put out the totality of articles in one single edition, the book contained more than 600 pages of documents in reprint and substantial comments and discussions by Nakatsuka Chikuzen.
Prof. Malm referred to the book Nihon no ongaku,
日本の音楽, "The Music of Japan",
by Tanabe Hisao, published by Bunka Kenkyūkai, Tokyo, in 1954.
Whether "incomplete" or not?, Nakatsuka Chikuzen's work as published in 1979 is still the most comprehensive and "complete" Japanese source collection and study of shakuhachi history that the world has ever been given.
ANONYMOUS – 1967
Quotations from the cover notes for the Lyrichord LP/vinyl record "Japanese Masterpieces for the Shakuhachi. Played by the masters of Meian-ryu, Kimpu-ryu, Tozan-ryu, and Kikusui-ryu, at Darumaden of Nanzenji and Meianji, Kyoto, Japan." Released in 1967. Record ID number: Lyrichord Stereo LLST 7176.s
"It was first used in Gagaku in the Sixth Century, but was abandoned when the dynasty fell. The revival came in the 13th Century with the rise of the Fuke sect, a branch of Zen Buddhism, in which sutra chanting was replaced by the shakuhachi; many Fuke monks went on pilgrimages with shakuhachis, and bamboo baskets to hide their identity.
The ranks of these itinerant begging and tootling preachers were swelled in the the 17th Century by ronin, uprooted samurai who were disenfranchised by the death of their masters. Many of these became Christians and were persecuted.
- - -
Legend has it that members of a sect formed by the >ronin forged a document giving them exclusive rights to play the shakuhachi and solicit alms with it. The reigning shogun during the Tokugawa period went along with their hoax, but his price was that they spy on the activities of other ronin.
Forbidden the use of their old samurai swords, the ronin made their shakuhachis longer and stouter for use as clubs in self-defense, and became musical stool pigeons who took to wearing large straw baskets over their heads to achieve the anonymity essential to their under-cover eavesdropping while playing along the streets of ancient Kyoto. The present tradition regards the basket-hats as "symbols of other-worldliness".
- - -
Koku. This long piece is played by two shakuhachis and a gong at Meianji, Kyoto, originally the headquarters of the Fuke. It was composed by a priest named Kyochiku in the 12th Century while meditating at a temple in Nara. In a dream he found himself floating in a boat. Suddenly thick mist rolled down the sky and blocked his view of the moon. On hearing the moving melody of a flute, he reached out for his favorite bamboo flute to accompany the ethereal melody. The music is long and simple, and the listener is expected to forget everything and "sleep in nothingness."
KOIZUMI FUMIO - 1969
Quotation from the cover notes written by the prominent Japanese musicologist Koizumi Fumio for the Nonesuch Records LP/vinyl phonogram titled "A Bell Ringing in the Empty Sky. Japanese Shakuhachi Music." Festuring Yamaguchi Gorō, shakuhachi. Released in 1969. Record ID number: H-72025.
"In the beginning of the 17th century, the shakuhachi was revived by a sect of Zen Buddhists known as the Fuke; the new model of the instrument now had only five finger-holes instead of six. The Fuke priests did not play this flute for purely musical purposes but blew it as a part of Buddhist practice; this was especially common among mendicants who traveled about Japan. They were called komosō, because when they wandered they covered their heads with straw baskets, or komo; thus komosō originally meant "priests in straw baskets." Later the name became transformed into komusō (literally, "priests of nothingness"), which is the more meaningful appellation."
DAIGAN MATSUNAGA & ALICIA MATSUNAGA - 1976
Daigan Matsunaga & Alicia Matsunaga: Foundation of Japanese
Buddhism. Vol. I: The Aristocratic Age. Vol. II: The Mass Movement.
Buddhist Books International, Los Angeles, Tokyo, 1974, 1976.
The origin of this school is believed to date back to a T'ang Chinese priest named Fuke Zenji (Chin. Pu-hua), who lived a simple life through the countryside to the accompaniment of bells and chanting.
The school was brought to Japan during the mid-thirteenth century by Shinji Muhon Kakushin (posthumous, Hottō Kokushi), who built the Kōkokuji temple in Kii province.
Kinsen, a disciple was legendarily believed to have been expert at the flute and invited to court.
During the early medieval period this group had not yet formed a sect, but constituted an important movement of half-monk half-layman beggar priests.
They were alternately called such names as 'boro-boro,' 'uma (horse) hijiri', or 'komosō' (monk of a straw mattress).
They travelled as transients throughout the countryside chanting the nembutsu, playing the shakuhachi flute and begging for alms.
Their popularity stemmed half from the entertainment they provided to the masses.
During the Warring States and early Tokugawa, the movement unified into a religious congregation.
Their evolution is difficult to trace and it is uncertain when they began to take the name komusō (monk of emptiness).
Some theories ascribe this new name to the seventh successor Komu, while others believe the early followers merged with existing door to door flute players known as the 'komusō'.
Still, another theory attributes the new name to the philosophical interpretation of the shakuhachi flute as an instrument of the Dharma symbolizing the pure mind of Enlightenment.
During the late Muromachi and early Tokugawa, as the movement grew, it gradually became a sanctuary for rōnin (masterless samurai) and other social outcasts.
The philosophy advocated no members, no patrons, and no fixed income.
Their life was devoted to alms begging, although some were known to engage in making tea kettles and teaching the shakuhachi flute.
The group recognized no scriptures, but rather believed that the flute was a method of controlling the mind and art of breathing, leading to spiritual awareness.
For those dissatisfied with the feudal system, it offered a natural sanctuary, yet as is so necessary in Japanese society, provided a social group or proper rationale for retreat.
in 1677 the Tokugawa government made its first attempt to regulate the various Komusō schools and at that time the main headquarter temples were regarded as the Ryōhōji of Musashi, Ichigatsuji of Shimofusa and Myōanji of Kyōto.
Ultimately during the declining era of Tokugawa control the movement was regarded as a possible threat to the government and breeding ground for undesirables.
In 1847 it was officially placed under the jurisdiction of the Rinzai sect and in 1871, shortly after the Meiji Restoration was banned."
Quoted from pages 261-262 in volume II.
JAMES H. SANFORD - 1977
Quotation from James H. Sanford's important article in Monumenta Nipponica, 1977, titled "Shakuhachi Zen. The Fukeshū and Komusō.
In: Monumenta Nipponica, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Winter, 1977), pp. 411-440. Published by Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan.
" - - -
Taken together, the chambara legend and Eliot's account contain almost all of the major elements of the standard understanding, Japanese or Western, of the komusō. The basic features of this understanding are so central to our study that I will list them here at the outset.
1. The Fukeshū was a subsect of Zen that could be traced back to the thirteenth century. (More specifically, it was usually considered as a subsect of the Rinzai school, although in practice the Fuke temples maintained a position quite independent of Rinzai authority.)
2. The members of the Fukeshū were called komusō.
3. Like all other Zen sects, the Fukeshū was originally a Chinese school with a long history on the mainland prior to its arrival in Japan.
4. Two of the most obvious social features of the komusō were: a reputation for extreme belligerency, and the practice of playing the flute as these 'monks' wandered about Japan on 'Zen pilgrimages'. (The Zen aspect of this custom was found in the komusō claim that their music was a vocal, though non-verbal, expression of the ineffable essence of Zen enlightenment.)
In spite of its widespread acceptance, this picture of the komusō as an ancient sect of Zen Buddhism with roots in China and a long subsequent history in Japan is in reality almost wholly false. The komusō movement was actually a purely Japanese product that began in or just prior to the Tokugawa era as a 'little tradition' phenomenon with no discernible Zen connections whatsoever. The traditional history of the Fuke sect was, in fact, a fantasy forged and disseminated in the middle of the Tokugawa period by komuso leaders who were engaged in a quite conscious program of self-legitimization. Prior to this process of rationalization, the komusō had been no more than a guild of begging musicians whose only connection with religion was a very nominal claim to the status of Buddhist lay-brother, a status that functioned primarily to justify their practice of begging for alms. There was, however, a pre-komusō guild of semi-religious beggar musicians who were called komosō, or 'mat monks' after the bedrolls they carried on their wanderings. They seem to have first appeared in late Ashikaga times and, like the later komusō, they attracted alms-givers by playing the flute, specifically the hitoyogiri type of flute. These komosō were seen as quite low-class itinerants and not as Zen musicians. 'Komusō' and 'komosō' are, of course, virtual homophones, and it is probable that the komosō 'mat monks' were actually nothing but early komusō, 'emptiness monks' and that the latter name, with its heavy Buddhist overtones, is simply a Zennicised version of the older term. A still earlier possible prototype of the komusō, fraternity is the boroboro or boronji, first mentioned in the fourteenth-century work Tsurezuregusa by Yoshida Kenkō. These sword-carrying lay monks were noted ruffians and have often been seen as proto-komusō, by Japanese scholars; however, they did not play the flute and the connection between the two groups may be no more than a coincidence of style."